IN THE FIELD GUIDE
featq
featq.com
FeatQ is a hosted feature-voting board platform that integrates with coding agents to turn top-voted user requests into build-ready specifications and automatically publishes changelogs. It supports email-based voting without user accounts and provides a seamless workflow from feedback collection to shipping features with automated notifications.
THE PRODUCT, BEYOND THE PITCH
Automatically researched · Not editorially reviewed · Sources checked Sep 14, 2026
A good fit for
- Founders and teams building with coding agents who want to automate feature prioritization and shipping.
Know the limitations
Not confirmed yet.
What you can do
- Automating the feedback-to-development workflow and closing the loop with voters via email notifications.
Features
- Hosted feedback board with voting, comments, statuses, and admin controls.
- Agent-ready spec generation from voted requests for coding agents to implement.
- Embeddable widget for collecting feedback inside products without SDK projects.
- Public changelog that publishes automatically when a request is marked done.
- MCP server per board to connect coding agents directly to the feature queue.
Integrations
Not confirmed yet.
Platforms & data export
Not confirmed yet.
THE COST FOR YOUR TEAM
Go beyond the starting price.
Published plan prices for your team size and usage. Results update as you type. Taxes, currency conversion and unlisted add-ons are excluded, and anything the source did not state is called out rather than guessed.
Cheapest fit for 1 person, all 1 tools
$19.00/month
$228.00 a year on these plans.
| Tool / plan | Monthly | Per year | What this assumes |
|---|---|---|---|
MonthlyCheapest fit Flat subscription | $19.00 | $228.00 | Automatically extracted from the linked pricing source. Seat allowances, usage limits, taxes and terms are not confirmed — check them with the provider. |
A practical workflow
- Add the FeatQ install prompt into coding agents to collect feedback inside the product.
- Users submit requests and vote with email-based identity to prioritize features without accounts.
- Coding agents pull the top request as a build-ready spec and implement it, then mark it done to publish changelog and notify voters.
Based on the sources below. Editorial review does not imply hands-on product testing.
Alternatives to explore
Filter alternatives →Candidates based on category and primary feature. Check feature and pricing differences before switching.
Plan a switch from featq →What changed
Changes to the facts recorded here, not a live scan of every vendor update. Save this tool to follow updates in your account.
Updated: export formats, features, plans, use cases, walkthrough
See recorded changes
exportFormatsBefore: ["Supports CSV export of feedback data."]
After: []
featuresBefore: ["Hosted feedback board with voting, comments, statuses, and admin controls.","Agent-ready spec generation from voted requests for direct implementation by coding agents.","Embeddable widget for collecting feedback inside your product without an SDK project.","Public changelog publishing that updates automatically when features are marked done.","CSV export of data and Slack notifications for updates."]
After: ["Hosted feedback board with voting, comments, statuses, and admin controls.","Agent-ready spec generation from voted requests for coding agents to implement.","Embeddable widget for collecting feedback inside products without SDK projects.","Public changelog that publishes automatically when a request is marked done.","MCP server per board to connect coding agents directly to the feature queue."]
plansBefore: []
After: [{"name":"Monthly","note":"Automatically extracted from the linked pricing source. Seat allowances, usage limits, taxes and terms are not confirmed — check them with the provider.","annual":null,"monthly":19,"perSeat":false,"currency":"USD","features":[],"extraUnit":null,"unitLabel":"","maximumSeats":null,"minimumSeats":1,"includedUnits":null,"startingPrice":false,"seatsConfirmed":false}]
useCasesBefore: ["Collecting and prioritizing user feature requests for software development teams using coding agents.","Automating the workflow from user feedback to feature shipping and changelog publishing."]
After: ["Automating the feedback-to-development workflow and closing the loop with voters via email notifications."]
walkthroughBefore: ["Add the widget in one prompt to collect feedback inside your product.","Users submit requests and vote with email-based identity, avoiding the need for user accounts.","Coding agents pull the top request as a build-ready spec and implement it.","When a request is marked done, FeatQ publishes the changelog and emails voters who opted in."]
After: ["Add the FeatQ install prompt into coding agents to collect feedback inside the product.","Users submit requests and vote with email-based identity to prioritize features without accounts.","Coding agents pull the top request as a build-ready spec and implement it, then mark it done to publish changelog and notify voters."]